I'll start with an apology: this a bit of a long post and somewhat disjointed. Some of it may be taken the wrong way, so please be assured that I think that what we're doing is worthwhile and that I certainly think social assistance is in need of a change; but it's more than just money. If anyone finds offense in or thinks ill of anything I say or thinks I've overlooked something, please comment or contact me, as I'm sure it would be a case of miscommunication. Here we go!
I'm quite conflicted in what I should/shouldn't be writing in response to doing this, but we were told to be candid, so I guess I should just say what's on my mind. Basically, I'm doing fine. Sure, there haven't been too many 'satisfying' meals, but I am by no means hungry. And yes, fresh fruit and vegetables would be wonderful right now, but I have enough food.
I won't list off all that I've eaten so far, but here's what I have left:
1 can of tuna
1 can of vegetable soup
2 small potatoes
2 (very) small onions
1 cup of rice
More than half a can of chick peas
Almost a whole loaf of bread (I put it in the freezer and just rediscovered it!)
1 can of carrots, peas and corn
1 can of green beans
1 box of macaroni
4 popsicles (1.79 juice boxes?)
I feel like I'll be having a feast for the last two days! I'm in the process of figuring out the nutrition comparison between what was in the hamper and what I should have each week, and I know it will be lacking, but I am seeing why someone would think that this is enough food for the week. I'm not sure that living this way for a week or even a few weeks throughout the year would be such a bad thing; I think it only comes up if you're doing this week after week after week. That's where the lack of nutrients and poor quality of the food will start to take effect.
This poses significant problems in my mind for what we're doing and the way things are. It's not so black and white. Yes, I think this is an unacceptable way to live; but I can also see why a change may not seem as necessary to some as it may to us. This is especially true when you look at the diets of a lot of people. It seems that everyone who is doing the challenge is used to a pretty significant portion of their diet having colour to it. This is certainly not the norm for the general public. If it were, public health would not have to fight a never-ending war in the name of 7-10 servings of vegetables. So many people who have the means to eat healthy simply don't.
From working in shelters, food banks, and just having friends in financial hardship, I can guarantee that there are plenty of people who rely on food hampers that wouldn't eat vegetable curry (or even a piece of broccoli) if it was served to them on a golden platter. It's difficult to say that we should be providing fresh vegetables in every food hamper or that social assistance should be increased so that people can eat healthier, because we can't speak for the eating habits of others. I can't tell you the number of times I've had a sandwich returned to me because it wasn't on bright-white wonderbread. Not everyone likes 'good' food.
Of there are people on social assistance would jump at the opportunity to buy an organic carrot or have some spinach in a hamper, but not everyone would. That's why change will be hard to come by (I promise you, I
am for it!); and that's why careful thought and creative ways of doing things need to be in place before we look for more money. Just like humanitarian aid, there has to be a plan, it has lead to sustainability and there has to be reason to believe that things will change. If we do this, it needs to be done right.
A brief thought into a big issue; but that's what's running through my mind. Do question me if I've missed the mark.
Time for toast!